Hong Kong vs Luxembourg: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Hong Kong
84.38
in 2014
Luxembourg
84.38
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
5th
Luxembourg rank
5th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Luxembourg
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 84.38 against 84.38 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 181 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 81.25 84.38 3.12 Luxembourg
2010s 82.5 84.38 1.88 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Hong Kong or Luxembourg?
Hong Kong, at 84.38 against 84.38 in Luxembourg as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Hong Kong and Luxembourg?
0, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Luxembourg?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong and Luxembourg rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Luxembourg ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.