Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Hong Kong
84.38
in 2014
Netherlands
84.38
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
5th
Netherlands rank
5th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Netherlands
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 84.38 against 84.38 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Netherlands ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.25 | 84.38 | 3.12 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 82.5 | 84.38 | 1.88 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Hong Kong or Netherlands?
- Hong Kong, at 84.38 against 84.38 in Netherlands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Hong Kong and Netherlands?
- 0, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Netherlands?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Netherlands rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 5th and Netherlands ranks 5th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.