Austria vs Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Austria
87.5
in 2014
Hong Kong
84.38
in 2014
Austria rank
4th
Hong Kong rank
5th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Austria
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Austria currently reports 87.5 against 84.38 in Hong Kong, a difference of 3.12.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Austria ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.93 | 81.25 | 2.68 | Austria |
| 2010s | 87.5 | 82.5 | 5 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Austria or Hong Kong?
- Austria, at 87.5 against 84.38 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Austria and Hong Kong?
- 3.12, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Hong Kong?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Austria and Hong Kong rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Austria ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.