Myanmar vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Myanmar
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 28.84 against 26.39 in Myanmar, a difference of 2.45.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Myanmar or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 28.84 against 26.39 in Myanmar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 2.45, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Myanmar and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Myanmar ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.