Cambodia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Cambodia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 31.75 against 28.84 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.91.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 182nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 185th of 190 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cambodia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Cambodia, at 31.75 against 28.84 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 2.91, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 182nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 185th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.