Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 31.92 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Papua New Guinea, 2003–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Papua New Guinea recorded 31.92 for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Papua New Guinea peaked at 31.92 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 30.88, in 2003.
That places Papua New Guinea 177th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Papua New Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 30.88 | — |
| 2004 | 30.88 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 30.88 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 30.88 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 30.88 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 30.88 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 31.92 | +3.4% |
| 2010 | 31.92 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 31.92 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 31.92 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 31.92 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 31.92 | +0.0% |
Papua New Guinea compared with similar countries
- Papua New Guinea's 31.92 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 51.38, 62% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Papua New Guinea's 31.92 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62.95, 51% of the median. (27 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.03 | 30.88 | 31.92 | 7 |
| 2010s | 31.92 | 31.92 | 31.92 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea
- 174 Cambodia 32.79 compare
- 175 Sao Tome and Principe 32.37 compare
- 176 Trinidad and Tobago 32.27 compare
- 178 Central African Republic 31.62 compare
- 179 Afghanistan 29.79 compare
- 180 India 29.04 compare
More reference data data for Papua New Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6846 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5295 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2811 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0038 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Papua New Guinea?
- Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Papua New Guinea was 31.92 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 31.92 in 2009.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.88 in 2003.
- How does Papua New Guinea rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 177th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.