Cambodia vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Cambodia
32.79
in 2014
Papua New Guinea
31.92
in 2014
Cambodia rank
171st
Papua New Guinea rank
174th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Papua New Guinea
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 32.79 against 31.92 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.87.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 171st and Papua New Guinea ranks 174th of 181 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 34.88 31.03 3.85 Cambodia
2010s 33.15 31.92 1.23 Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Cambodia or Papua New Guinea?
Cambodia, at 32.79 against 31.92 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Cambodia and Papua New Guinea?
0.87, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Papua New Guinea?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Cambodia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Cambodia ranks 171st and Papua New Guinea ranks 174th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.