Papua New Guinea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Papua New Guinea
31.92
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago
32.27
in 2014
Papua New Guinea rank
176th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
175th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 32.27 against 31.92 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.35.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 176th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 175th of 183 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.09 | 32.27 | 1.18 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 31.92 | 32.27 | 0.3454 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 32.27 against 31.92 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.35, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 176th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 175th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.