India vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

India
29.04
in 2014
Papua New Guinea
31.92
in 2014
India rank
177th
Papua New Guinea rank
174th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • India
  • Papua New Guinea
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 31.92 against 29.04 in India, a difference of 2.88.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times India's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

India ranks 177th and Papua New Guinea ranks 174th of 181 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 29.04 31.03 1.99 Papua New Guinea
2010s 29.04 31.92 2.88 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, India or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 31.92 against 29.04 in India as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between India and Papua New Guinea?
2.88, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Papua New Guinea?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do India and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
India ranks 177th and Papua New Guinea ranks 174th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.