Papua New Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Papua New Guinea
31.92
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
32.37
in 2014
Papua New Guinea rank
177th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
175th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 32.37 against 31.92 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 175th of 184 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.05 | 29.09 | 1.97 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 31.92 | 30.56 | 1.36 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 32.37 against 31.92 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.45, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 175th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.