Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic
Central African Republic: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 31.62 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic, 2003–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Central African Republic stood at 31.62. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Central African Republic peaked at 31.62 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 31.62, in 2003.
Central African Republic ranks 178th of 184 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Central African Republic, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 31.62 | — |
| 2004 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 31.62 | +0.0% |
Central African Republic compared with similar countries
- Central African Republic's 31.62 is below the median for low income countries, which is 46.52, 68% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Central African Republic's 31.62 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 49.8, 63% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.62 | 31.62 | 31.62 | 7 |
| 2010s | 31.62 | 31.62 | 31.62 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Central African Republic
- 175 Sao Tome and Principe 32.37 compare
- 176 Trinidad and Tobago 32.27 compare
- 177 Papua New Guinea 31.92 compare
- 179 Afghanistan 29.79 compare
- 180 India 29.04 compare
- 181 Suriname 28.84 compare
More reference data data for Central African Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1959 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0271 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6569 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.7203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1476 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Central African Republic?
- Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Central African Republic was 31.62 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 31.62 in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Central African Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 31.62 in 2003.
- How does Central African Republic rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 178th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Central African Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Central African Republic data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.