Jordan vs Maldives: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Jordan
54.04
in 2014
Maldives
54.78
in 2014
Jordan rank
107th
Maldives rank
105th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 54.78 against 54.04 in Jordan, a difference of 0.74.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 107th and Maldives ranks 105th of 181 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.04 | 57.38 | 3.33 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 54.04 | 55.82 | 1.78 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Jordan or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 54.78 against 54.04 in Jordan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Jordan and Maldives?
- 0.74, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Maldives?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Jordan and Maldives rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Jordan ranks 107th and Maldives ranks 105th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.