Jordan vs Palestine: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Jordan
54.04
in 2014
Palestine
54.48
in 2014
Jordan rank
107th
Palestine rank
106th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 54.48 against 54.04 in Jordan, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 107th and Palestine ranks 106th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.04 | 50.56 | 3.48 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 54.04 | 54.48 | 0.4375 | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Jordan or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 54.48 against 54.04 in Jordan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Jordan and Palestine?
- 0.44, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Palestine?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Jordan and Palestine rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Jordan ranks 107th and Palestine ranks 106th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.