Jamaica vs Jordan: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Jamaica
54.96
in 2014
Jordan
54.04
in 2014
Jamaica rank
104th
Jordan rank
107th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Jamaica
- Jordan
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 54.96 against 54.04 in Jordan, a difference of 0.92.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 104th and Jordan ranks 107th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.59 | 54.04 | 0.547 | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 53.81 | 54.04 | 0.2322 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Jamaica or Jordan?
- Jamaica, at 54.96 against 54.04 in Jordan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Jamaica and Jordan?
- 0.92, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Jordan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Jamaica and Jordan rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Jamaica ranks 104th and Jordan ranks 107th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.