Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in South Sudan
South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in South Sudan, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
South Sudan recorded 1.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
That places South Sudan 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in South Sudan, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
South Sudan compared with similar countries
- South Sudan's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for low income countries, which is 3.25 DB17-20 methodology, 46% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- South Sudan's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near South Sudan
- 172 Angola 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Czechia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Eritrea 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Finland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Gabon 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Iceland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Mongolia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Myanmar 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Namibia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 San Marino 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Suriname 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 East Timor 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for South Sudan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.41 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 6.36 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 43,123 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 684.53 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 325.82 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 8,797 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 577.67 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 693.63 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.227 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in South Sudan?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in South Sudan was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in South Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in South Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does South Sudan rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- South Sudan ranks 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this South Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.