Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Gabon
Gabon: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Gabon, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Gabon recorded 1.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Gabon 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Gabon, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Gabon compared with similar countries
- Gabon's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 43% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Gabon's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Gabon
- 172 Angola 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Czechia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Eritrea 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Finland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Iceland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Mongolia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Myanmar 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Namibia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 San Marino 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 South Sudan 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Suriname 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 East Timor 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Gabon
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0505 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0931 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0031 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0931 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.107 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1347 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2352 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5278 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Gabon?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Gabon was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Gabon?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Gabon?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Gabon rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Gabon ranks 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Gabon data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.