Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in San Marino
San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in San Marino, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in San Marino is 1.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
San Marino ranks 172nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in San Marino, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
San Marino compared with similar countries
- San Marino's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 43% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- San Marino's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 43% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near San Marino
- 172 Angola 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Czechia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Eritrea 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Finland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Gabon 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Iceland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Mongolia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Myanmar 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Namibia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 South Sudan 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Suriname 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 East Timor 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for San Marino
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 0.8597 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 0.8597 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 0.8597 (2026)
- Civil liberties rating, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 1 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Free country, gaps filled 2 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating 1 (2025)
- Free country 2 (2025)
- Consumer price index 131.91 2010 = 100 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in San Marino?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in San Marino was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in San Marino?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in San Marino?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does San Marino rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- San Marino ranks 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this San Marino data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.