Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mongolia
Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mongolia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mongolia is 1.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
That places Mongolia 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Mongolia compared with similar countries
- Mongolia's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 43% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Mongolia's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 172 Angola 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Czechia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Eritrea 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Finland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Gabon 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Iceland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Myanmar 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Namibia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 San Marino 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Sao Tome and Principe 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 South Sudan 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 Suriname 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 172 East Timor 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Mongolia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8173 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0069 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 12.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0378 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mongolia?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mongolia was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Mongolia rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Mongolia ranks 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.