Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Congo
Congo: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Congo, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Congo recorded 2.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
That places Congo 141st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Congo, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Congo compared with similar countries
- Congo's 2.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 83% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Congo's 2.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 83% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Congo
- 141 Belarus 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Belize 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Bhutan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Botswana 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Cape Verde 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Cameroon 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Democratic Republic of Congo 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Gambia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Guinea 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Kyrgyzstan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Maldives 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Mali 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Qatar 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Samoa 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Somalia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Tajikistan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Tonga 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Uzbekistan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Congo
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0199 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1866 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2108 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0031 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2108 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0668 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0724 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9126 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.017 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Congo?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Congo was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Congo rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Congo ranks 141st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.