Belarus vs Congo, Rep.: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time
- Belarus
- Congo, Rep.
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Congo, Rep., a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo, Rep. has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 138th and Congo, Rep. ranks 138th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Belarus or Congo, Rep.?
- Belarus, at 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Congo, Rep. as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Belarus and Congo, Rep.?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Congo, Rep.?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Congo, Rep. rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Belarus ranks 138th and Congo, Rep. ranks 138th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.