Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Cape Verde
Cape Verde: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Cape Verde, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Cape Verde is 2.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
That places Cape Verde 141st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Cape Verde, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Cape Verde compared with similar countries
- Cape Verde's 2.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 71% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Cape Verde's 2.5 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 83% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Cape Verde
- 141 Belarus 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Belize 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Bhutan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Botswana 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Cameroon 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Democratic Republic of Congo 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Congo 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Gambia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Guinea 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Kyrgyzstan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Maldives 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Mali 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Qatar 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Samoa 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Somalia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Tajikistan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Tonga 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 141 Uzbekistan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Cape Verde
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0443 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0284 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0737 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0737 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1485 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2006 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1251 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4822 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0055 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Cape Verde?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Cape Verde was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Cape Verde?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Cape Verde?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Cape Verde rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Cape Verde ranks 141st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Cape Verde data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.