Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Democratic Republic of Congo

Democratic Republic of Congo: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
138th
of 188 countries
All-time high
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2019

00.511.522.52015201720192015: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Democratic Republic of Congo is 2.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

That places Democratic Republic of Congo 138th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo

  1. 138 Belarus 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 138 Belize 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 138 Bhutan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 138 Botswana 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 138 Cape Verde 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 138 Cameroon 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 138 Congo 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 138 Gambia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 138 Guinea 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 138 Kyrgyzstan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 138 Maldives 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  12. 138 Mali 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  13. 138 Qatar 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  14. 138 Samoa 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  15. 138 Somalia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  16. 138 Tajikistan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  17. 138 Tonga 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  18. 138 Uzbekistan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo

All data for Democratic Republic of Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Democratic Republic of Congo?
Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Democratic Republic of Congo was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The highest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 138th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.