Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
140th
of 190 countries
All-time high
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Kyrgyzstan, 2015–2019

00.511.522.52015201720192015: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 2.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Kyrgyzstan is 2.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

That places Kyrgyzstan 140th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 140 Belarus 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 140 Belize 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 140 Bhutan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 140 Botswana 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 140 Cabo Verde 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 140 Cameroon 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 140 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 140 Congo 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 140 Gambia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 140 Guinea 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 140 Maldives 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  12. 140 Mali 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  13. 140 Qatar 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  14. 140 Samoa 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  15. 140 Somalia 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  16. 140 Tajikistan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  17. 140 Tonga 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  18. 140 Uzbekistan 2.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Kyrgyzstan?
Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Kyrgyzstan was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 140th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/">Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.