Micronesia, Federated States of vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

Micronesia, Federated States of
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Zambia
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
90th
Zambia rank
90th

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • Zambia
00.10.20.30.40.5201520172019

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Zambia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 90th of 190 countries.

Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Micronesia, Federated States of or Zambia?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Zambia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Micronesia, Federated States of and Zambia?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Zambia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 90th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/micronesia-fed-sts/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/micronesia-fed-sts/zambia/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.