Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sudan

Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 77.8% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
77.8%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
36th
of 191 countries
All-time high
77.8%
in 2004
All-time low
77.8%
in 2004
Years of data
16
2004–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sudan, 2004–2019

0204060802004201120192004: 77.82005: 77.82006: 77.82007: 77.82008: 77.82009: 77.82010: 77.82011: 77.82012: 77.82013: 77.82014: 77.82015: 77.82016: 77.82017: 77.82018: 77.82019: 77.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Sudan recorded 77.8% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Sudan peaked at 77.8% in 2004 and was at its lowest, 77.8%, in 2004.

That places Sudan 36th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sudan, 2004 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2004 77.8% —
2005 77.8% +0.0%
2006 77.8% +0.0%
2007 77.8% +0.0%
2008 77.8% +0.0%
2009 77.8% +0.0%
2010 77.8% +0.0%
2011 77.8% +0.0%
2012 77.8% +0.0%
2013 77.8% +0.0%
2014 77.8% +0.0%
2015 77.8% +0.0%
2016 77.8% +0.0%
2017 77.8% +0.0%
2018 77.8% +0.0%
2019 77.8% +0.0%

Sudan compared with similar countries

  • Sudan's 77.8% is above the median for low income countries, which is 61.5%, 1.3× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Sudan's 77.8% is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 56.5%, 1.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 77.8% 77.8% 77.8% 6
2010s 77.8% 77.8% 77.8% 10

Countries ranked near Sudan

  1. 33 Poland 78.3% compare
  2. 34 Equatorial Guinea 78.2% compare
  3. 35 Barbados 78.0% compare
  4. 36 Cape Verde 77.8% compare
  5. 38 Gambia 77.2% compare
  6. 39 Slovakia 77.1% compare
  7. 39 Uzbekistan 77.1% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Sudan

All data for Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Sudan?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Sudan was 77.8% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 77.8% in 2004.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 77.8% in 2004.
How does Sudan rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Sudan ranks 36th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sudan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sudan. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/sudan/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sudan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.