Slovakia vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Slovakia
77.1%
in 2019
Sudan
77.8%
in 2019
Slovakia rank
39th
Sudan rank
36th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Slovakia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 77.8% against 77.1% in Slovakia, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Slovakia ranks 39th and Sudan ranks 36th of 191 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.7% | 77.8% | 8.1% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 69.1% | 77.8% | 8.7% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Slovakia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 77.8% against 77.1% in Slovakia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Slovakia and Sudan?
- 0.7%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Sudan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Slovakia and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Slovakia ranks 39th and Sudan ranks 36th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.