Barbados vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Barbados
78.0%
in 2019
Sudan
77.8%
in 2019
Barbados rank
35th
Sudan rank
36th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Barbados
- Sudan
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 78.0% against 77.8% in Sudan, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 35th and Sudan ranks 36th of 190 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Barbados or Sudan?
- Barbados, at 78.0% against 77.8% in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Barbados and Sudan?
- 0.2%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Barbados ranks 35th and Sudan ranks 36th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.