Poland vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Poland
78.3%
in 2019
Sudan
77.8%
in 2019
Poland rank
33rd
Sudan rank
36th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Poland
- Sudan
How they compare
Poland currently reports 78.3% against 77.8% in Sudan, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 33rd and Sudan ranks 36th of 190 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.7% | 77.8% | 0.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 78.4% | 77.8% | 0.6% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Poland or Sudan?
- Poland, at 78.3% against 77.8% in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Poland and Sudan?
- 0.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sudan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Poland and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Poland ranks 33rd and Sudan ranks 36th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.