Cabo Verde vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Cabo Verde
77.8%
in 2019
Sudan
77.8%
in 2019
Cabo Verde rank
36th
Sudan rank
36th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Cabo Verde
- Sudan
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 77.8% against 77.8% in Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 36th and Sudan ranks 36th of 190 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.6% | 77.8% | 2.2% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 77.6% | 77.8% | 0.2% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Cabo Verde or Sudan?
- Cabo Verde, at 77.8% against 77.8% in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Cabo Verde and Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cabo Verde and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Cabo Verde ranks 36th and Sudan ranks 36th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.