Sudan vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Sudan
77.8%
in 2019
Uzbekistan
77.1%
in 2019
Sudan rank
36th
Uzbekistan rank
39th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Sudan
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 77.8% against 77.1% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 36th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 191 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.8% | 75.8% | 2.1% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 77.8% | 77.1% | 0.8% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Sudan or Uzbekistan?
- Sudan, at 77.8% against 77.1% in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Sudan and Uzbekistan?
- 0.7%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Uzbekistan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Sudan and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Sudan ranks 36th and Uzbekistan ranks 39th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.