Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Hong Kong

Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 73.6% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
73.6%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
65th
of 191 countries
All-time high
73.6%
in 2003
All-time low
73.6%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Hong Kong, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 73.62004: 73.62005: 73.62006: 73.62007: 73.62008: 73.62009: 73.62010: 73.62011: 73.62012: 73.62013: 73.62014: 73.62015: 73.62016: 73.62017: 73.62018: 73.62019: 73.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Hong Kong stood at 73.6%. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Hong Kong peaked at 73.6% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 73.6%, in 2003.

Hong Kong ranks 65th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Hong Kong, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Hong Kong, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 73.6%
2004 73.6% +0.0%
2005 73.6% +0.0%
2006 73.6% +0.0%
2007 73.6% +0.0%
2008 73.6% +0.0%
2009 73.6% +0.0%
2010 73.6% +0.0%
2011 73.6% +0.0%
2012 73.6% +0.0%
2013 73.6% +0.0%
2014 73.6% +0.0%
2015 73.6% +0.0%
2016 73.6% +0.0%
2017 73.6% +0.0%
2018 73.6% +0.0%
2019 73.6% +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 73.6% 73.6% 73.6% 7
2010s 73.6% 73.6% 73.6% 10

Countries ranked near Hong Kong

  1. 62 Denmark 73.9% compare
  2. 63 Japan 73.8% compare
  3. 63 Belarus 73.8% compare
  4. 65 Lithuania 73.6% compare
  5. 67 Netherlands 73.2% compare
  6. 68 Switzerland 73.1% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Hong Kong

All data for Hong Kong →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Hong Kong?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Hong Kong was 73.6% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Hong Kong?
The highest recorded value was 73.6% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Hong Kong?
The lowest recorded value was 73.6% in 2003.
How does Hong Kong rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Hong Kong ranks 65th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Hong Kong?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Hong Kong. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/hong-kong-sar-china/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Hong Kong</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.