Hong Kong, China vs Japan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Hong Kong, China
73.6%
in 2019
Japan
73.8%
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
65th
Japan rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 73.8% against 73.6% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 65th and Japan ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.6% | 63.9% | 9.7% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 73.6% | 70.8% | 2.7% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Hong Kong, China or Japan?
- Japan, at 73.8% against 73.6% in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Hong Kong, China and Japan?
- 0.2%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Japan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Japan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 65th and Japan ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.