Belarus vs Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Belarus
73.8%
in 2019
Hong Kong
73.6%
in 2019
Belarus rank
63rd
Hong Kong rank
65th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Belarus
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 73.8% against 73.6% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 63rd and Hong Kong ranks 65th of 191 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.7% | 73.6% | 2.2% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 73.8% | 73.6% | 0.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Belarus or Hong Kong?
- Belarus, at 73.8% against 73.6% in Hong Kong as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Belarus and Hong Kong?
- 0.2%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Hong Kong?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Hong Kong rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Belarus ranks 63rd and Hong Kong ranks 65th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.