Hong Kong, China vs Switzerland: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Hong Kong, China
73.6%
in 2019
Switzerland
73.1%
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
65th
Switzerland rank
68th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Switzerland
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 73.6% against 73.1% in Switzerland, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Switzerland ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 65th and Switzerland ranks 68th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.6% | 75.4% | 1.8% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 73.6% | 73.1% | 0.4% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Hong Kong, China or Switzerland?
- Hong Kong, China, at 73.6% against 73.1% in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
- 0.5%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Switzerland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Switzerland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 65th and Switzerland ranks 68th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.