Denmark vs Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Denmark
73.9%
in 2019
Hong Kong
73.6%
in 2019
Denmark rank
62nd
Hong Kong rank
65th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Denmark
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 73.9% against 73.6% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Denmark ranks 62nd and Hong Kong ranks 65th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.5% | 73.6% | 0.1% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 73.9% | 73.6% | 0.3% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Denmark or Hong Kong?
- Denmark, at 73.9% against 73.6% in Hong Kong as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Denmark and Hong Kong?
- 0.3%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Hong Kong rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Denmark ranks 62nd and Hong Kong ranks 65th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.