Benin vs Eswatini: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Benin
27.3%
in 2019
Eswatini
37.0%
in 2019
Benin rank
177th
Eswatini rank
175th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Benin
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 37.0% against 27.3% in Benin, a difference of 9.7%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Benin's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 177th and Eswatini ranks 175th of 190 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.3% | 37.0% | 9.7% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 27.3% | 37.0% | 9.7% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Benin or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 37.0% against 27.3% in Benin as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Benin and Eswatini?
- 9.7%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Benin and Eswatini rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Benin ranks 177th and Eswatini ranks 175th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.