Eswatini vs Mozambique: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Eswatini
37.0%
in 2019
Mozambique
40.2%
in 2019
Eswatini rank
175th
Mozambique rank
173rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 40.2% against 37.0% in Eswatini, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 175th and Mozambique ranks 173rd of 190 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.0% | 40.2% | 3.1% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 37.0% | 40.2% | 3.1% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Eswatini or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 40.2% against 37.0% in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 3.2%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mozambique?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Mozambique rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 175th and Mozambique ranks 173rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.