The demographic transition in Sweden in Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico: The demographic transition in Sweden was 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2008. ▼ Falling
The demographic transition in Sweden in Puerto Rico, 1910–2008
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Puerto Rico recorded 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2008. That is the lowest value across all 98 years on record.
The figure is down 2.6% on the previous year and down 28.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Puerto Rico peaked at 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1931 and was at its lowest, 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2008.
Puerto Rico ranks 38th of 56 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 98 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Puerto Rico, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1910 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1911 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1912 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1913 | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1914 | 39.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.0% |
| 1915 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.5% |
| 1916 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1917 | 35.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1918 | 40.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.5% |
| 1919 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.2% |
| 1920 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.0% |
| 1921 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1922 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1923 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1924 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1925 | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1926 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1927 | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1928 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.9% |
| 1929 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1930 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1931 | 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +28.7% |
| 1932 | 41.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.3% |
| 1933 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.0% |
| 1934 | 39.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1935 | 39.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1936 | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1937 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1938 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1939 | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1940 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1941 | 39.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1942 | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1943 | 38.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1944 | 40.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.9% |
| 1945 | 41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1946 | 41.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1947 | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1948 | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1949 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1950 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1951 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1952 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1953 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1954 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1955 | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1956 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1957 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1958 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1959 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1960 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1962 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1963 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1964 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1966 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1967 | 26.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1968 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1969 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1970 | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1971 | 25.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1972 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1973 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1974 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1975 | 23.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1976 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1977 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1978 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1979 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1980 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1981 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1982 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1983 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1984 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1985 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1988 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1990 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1991 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1992 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1993 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1996 | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1997 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1998 | 16.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1999 | 15.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 2000 | 15.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 2001 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 2002 | 13.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 2003 | 13.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 2004 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 2005 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 2006 | 12.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 2007 | 11.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 2008 | 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
Puerto Rico compared with similar countries
- Puerto Rico's 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 99% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Puerto Rico's 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 63% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Puerto Rico changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1931 | +28.7% | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 36.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 37.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 39.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 40.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 35.17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 29.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 24.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 20.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 17.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 2000s | 13.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
Countries ranked near Puerto Rico
- 35 Mauritius 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 36 Belgium 11.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 37 Cuba 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 39 Denmark 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 40 Albania 11.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 41 Finland 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Puerto Rico
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1709 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2501 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0791 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 974.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 34.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0011 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 34.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2653 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,009 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0.0315 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Puerto Rico?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Puerto Rico was 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2008, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The highest recorded value was 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1931.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2008.
- How does Puerto Rico rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Puerto Rico ranks 38th out of 56 countries with data for 2008.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Puerto Rico?
- Over the last ten years it is down 28.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Puerto Rico data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 98 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.