The demographic transition in Sweden in Mauritius
Mauritius: The demographic transition in Sweden was 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 2.7%
World rank
35th
of 56 countries
All-time high
49.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1950
All-time low
11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2010
Years of data
136
1875–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Mauritius, 1875–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in Mauritius is 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2010. That is the lowest value across all 136 years on record.
That represents a change of down 2.7% on the previous year and down 31.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Mauritius peaked at 49.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1950 and was at its lowest, 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2010.
Mauritius ranks 35th of 56 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 136 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1875 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1876 | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1877 | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1878 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1879 | 36.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.1% |
| 1880 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1881 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1882 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1883 | 34.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1884 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.5% |
| 1885 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1886 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1887 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1888 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.8% |
| 1889 | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1890 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1891 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1892 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.2% |
| 1893 | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.5% |
| 1894 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.9% |
| 1895 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1896 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -17.0% |
| 1897 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.6% |
| 1898 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1899 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1900 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.5% |
| 1901 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.8% |
| 1902 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1903 | 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1904 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1905 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.7% |
| 1907 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.2% |
| 1908 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1909 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1910 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +14.0% |
| 1912 | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.4% |
| 1913 | 40.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +14.9% |
| 1914 | 40.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.7% |
| 1916 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1917 | 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 1918 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1919 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1920 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1921 | 38.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.5% |
| 1922 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1923 | 36.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1924 | 41.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.7% |
| 1925 | 42.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1926 | 39.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1927 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.4% |
| 1928 | 37.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.9% |
| 1929 | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.3% |
| 1930 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.1% |
| 1931 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.0% |
| 1932 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.5% |
| 1933 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +31.5% |
| 1934 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1935 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1936 | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1937 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1938 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1939 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.0% |
| 1940 | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -17.3% |
| 1941 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.7% |
| 1942 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1943 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1944 | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +33.1% |
| 1945 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.5% |
| 1946 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.8% |
| 1948 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1949 | 46.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.0% |
| 1950 | 49.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.8% |
| 1951 | 47.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1952 | 48 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1953 | 45.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1954 | 40.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.5% |
| 1955 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1956 | 43.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.6% |
| 1957 | 42.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1958 | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1959 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1960 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1961 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1962 | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1963 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.5% |
| 1964 | 37.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1965 | 35.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1966 | 34.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1967 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.3% |
| 1968 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.5% |
| 1970 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1971 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1972 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1973 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1974 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.2% |
| 1975 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1976 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1977 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.1% |
| 1979 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1980 | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1981 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1982 | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.7% |
| 1983 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.5% |
| 1984 | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1985 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1986 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1987 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1988 | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1989 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1990 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1991 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1992 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1993 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1994 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1995 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1996 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 17.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1998 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1999 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 2000 | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 2001 | 16.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 2002 | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 2003 | 15.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 2004 | 15.59 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 15.14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 2006 | 14.05 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.2% |
| 2007 | 13.51 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 2008 | 12.91 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 2009 | 12.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 2010 | 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 64% of the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 36.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 5 |
| 1880s | 36.64 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 36.31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 36.17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 36.74 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 37.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 32.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 37.95 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 46.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 43.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 49.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 35.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 25.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 20.97 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 19.05 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.89 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
- 32 Cyprus 12.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 33 Sweden 12.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 34 China 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 36 Belgium 11.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 37 Cuba 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 38 Puerto Rico 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Mauritius
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0409 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0343 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2885 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0008 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Mauritius?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Mauritius was 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 49.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1950.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010.
- How does Mauritius rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Mauritius ranks 35th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 136 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.