The demographic transition in Sweden in Denmark
Denmark: The demographic transition in Sweden was 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 0.5%
World rank
39th
of 56 countries
All-time high
34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1815
All-time low
9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1983
Years of data
211
1800–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Denmark, 1800–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in Denmark is 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2010.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.5% on the previous year and down 9.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Denmark peaked at 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1815 and was at its lowest, 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1983.
That places Denmark 39th out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 211 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Denmark, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1800 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1801 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1802 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1803 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1804 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1805 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1806 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.9% |
| 1807 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1808 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1809 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1810 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1811 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1812 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1813 | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1814 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1815 | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.2% |
| 1816 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1817 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1818 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1819 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1820 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1821 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1822 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.0% |
| 1823 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1824 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1825 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1827 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1828 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1829 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1830 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1831 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1832 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.1% |
| 1833 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +19.3% |
| 1834 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1835 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1836 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1837 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1838 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1839 | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1840 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.8% |
| 1841 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1842 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1843 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1844 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1845 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1846 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1847 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1848 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1850 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1851 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1852 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.3% |
| 1853 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1854 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1855 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1856 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1857 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1858 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1859 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1860 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1861 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1862 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1863 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1864 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1865 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1866 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1867 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1868 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1869 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1870 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1871 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1872 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1873 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1874 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1875 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1876 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1877 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1878 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1879 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1880 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1881 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1882 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1883 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1884 | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1885 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1886 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1887 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1888 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1889 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1890 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1891 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1892 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1893 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.1% |
| 1894 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1895 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1896 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1897 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1898 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1899 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1900 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1903 | 28.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1904 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1905 | 28.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1906 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1907 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1908 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1909 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1910 | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1911 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1912 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1913 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1914 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1916 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1917 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1918 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1919 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1920 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.4% |
| 1921 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1922 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1923 | 22.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1924 | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1925 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1926 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1927 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1928 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1930 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1931 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1932 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1934 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1935 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1936 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1937 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1938 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1939 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1940 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1941 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1942 | 20.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.3% |
| 1943 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.9% |
| 1944 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.1% |
| 1945 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1946 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1947 | 22.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1948 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.1% |
| 1949 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1950 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1951 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1952 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1954 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1955 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1957 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1958 | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1959 | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1960 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1961 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1963 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 1964 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1965 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1966 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1967 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.7% |
| 1968 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.9% |
| 1969 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1970 | 14.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1971 | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1972 | 15.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1973 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1974 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1975 | 14.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1976 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.2% |
| 1977 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1979 | 11.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1980 | 11.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1981 | 10.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.1% |
| 1982 | 10.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1983 | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1984 | 10.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1985 | 10.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1986 | 10.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1987 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1988 | 11.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1989 | 12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1990 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1991 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1992 | 13.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.8% |
| 1993 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1994 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1995 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.9% |
| 1996 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1997 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1998 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1999 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2000 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 2001 | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 2002 | 11.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 2003 | 12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 2004 | 11.96 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 2005 | 11.87 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2006 | 11.95 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 11.74 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 2008 | 11.85 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 2010 | 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
Denmark compared with similar countries
- Denmark's 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 98% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Denmark's 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.0× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 31.24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1810s | 31.45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1820s | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1830s | 30.18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1840s | 30.32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1850s | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1860s | 30.97 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1870s | 31.27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1880s | 32.06 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 30.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 28.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 17.92 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 20.95 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 17.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 16.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 13.69 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 10.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.76 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.95 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Denmark
- 36 Belgium 11.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 37 Cuba 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 38 Puerto Rico 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 40 Albania 11.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 41 Finland 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 42 Canada 11.34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Denmark
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1915 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4109 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Denmark?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Denmark was 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Denmark?
- The highest recorded value was 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1815.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Denmark?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1983.
- How does Denmark rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Denmark ranks 39th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Denmark?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Denmark data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 211 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.