The demographic transition in Sweden in Cuba
Cuba: The demographic transition in Sweden was 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009. ▼ Falling
Latest (2009)
11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 6.1%
World rank
37th
of 56 countries
All-time high
36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1962
All-time low
9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2006
Years of data
74
1931–2009
The demographic transition in Sweden in Cuba, 1931–2009
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Cuba recorded 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2009.
That represents a change of up 6.1% on the previous year and down 14.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Cuba peaked at 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1962 and was at its lowest, 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2006.
That places Cuba 37th out of 56 countries with data for 2009, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 74 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Cuba, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1931 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1932 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -33.7% |
| 1933 | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1934 | 19.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.9% |
| 1935 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1936 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +18.5% |
| 1938 | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.5% |
| 1939 | 15.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -38.7% |
| 1940 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.8% |
| 1941 | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1944 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +113.0% |
| 1945 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -42.2% |
| 1946 | 23.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +14.9% |
| 1947 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +25.9% |
| 1948 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1949 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1950 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1951 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.2% |
| 1952 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1953 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.9% |
| 1957 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1958 | 27.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1959 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.7% |
| 1960 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1961 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.3% |
| 1962 | 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.2% |
| 1963 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1964 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1966 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1967 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1968 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1969 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1970 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1971 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.5% |
| 1972 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1973 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -18.5% |
| 1974 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.6% |
| 1975 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1976 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1977 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.1% |
| 1978 | 15.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.0% |
| 1979 | 14.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1980 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1981 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1982 | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.4% |
| 1983 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1984 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1985 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.4% |
| 1986 | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.4% |
| 1987 | 17.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.7% |
| 1988 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1989 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1990 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 16.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.0% |
| 1992 | 14.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.5% |
| 1993 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1994 | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1995 | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1997 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.7% |
| 1998 | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1999 | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 2001 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 2002 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 2003 | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 2004 | 11.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.4% |
| 2005 | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 2006 | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.4% |
| 2007 | 10.01 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 10.91 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.0% |
| 2009 | 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.1% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 63% of the median. (14 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 63% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1944 | +113.0% | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1945 | -42.2% | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 20.11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1940s | 25.69 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8 |
| 1950s | 28.11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 |
| 1960s | 32.91 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 22.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 34 China 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 35 Mauritius 11.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 36 Belgium 11.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 38 Puerto Rico 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 39 Denmark 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 40 Albania 11.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Cuba?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Cuba was 11.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1962.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2006.
- How does Cuba rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Cuba ranks 37th out of 56 countries with data for 2009.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 74 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.