The demographic transition in Sweden in Finland
Finland: The demographic transition in Sweden was 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 0.4%
World rank
41st
of 56 countries
All-time high
46.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1755
All-time low
10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2002
Years of data
259
1751–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Finland, 1751–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Finland recorded 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2010.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.4% on the previous year and up 3.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Finland peaked at 46.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1755 and was at its lowest, 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2002.
That places Finland 41st out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 259 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Finland, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1751 | 44.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1752 | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1753 | 44.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1754 | 46.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1755 | 46.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1756 | 45.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1757 | 43.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1758 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1759 | 44.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1760 | 46.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1761 | 45.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1762 | 41.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.8% |
| 1763 | 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.1% |
| 1764 | 45.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.3% |
| 1765 | 42.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1766 | 41.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1767 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1768 | 42.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 1769 | 42.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1770 | 40.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1771 | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.1% |
| 1772 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1773 | 37.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1774 | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.3% |
| 1775 | 40.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.2% |
| 1776 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1777 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1778 | 42.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.5% |
| 1779 | 43.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1780 | 41.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1781 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.5% |
| 1782 | 41.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.6% |
| 1783 | 40 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1784 | 42.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.8% |
| 1785 | 39.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1786 | 39.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1787 | 40.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1788 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.6% |
| 1789 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1790 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.2% |
| 1791 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1792 | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.2% |
| 1793 | 43.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1794 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1795 | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1796 | 39.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1797 | 41.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1798 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.3% |
| 1799 | 38.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1800 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1801 | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.3% |
| 1802 | 39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1803 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.2% |
| 1804 | 39.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.8% |
| 1805 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1806 | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1807 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1808 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -16.0% |
| 1809 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1810 | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +41.6% |
| 1811 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.1% |
| 1812 | 38.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.9% |
| 1813 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.5% |
| 1814 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1815 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1816 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1817 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1818 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1819 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.0% |
| 1820 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1821 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.1% |
| 1822 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.0% |
| 1823 | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.2% |
| 1824 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1825 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1826 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1827 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1828 | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.1% |
| 1829 | 38.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1830 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1831 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1832 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1833 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.5% |
| 1834 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +21.2% |
| 1835 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.3% |
| 1836 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.3% |
| 1837 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1838 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1839 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.0% |
| 1840 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1841 | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1842 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.4% |
| 1843 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1844 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1845 | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1846 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1847 | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1848 | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.7% |
| 1849 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1850 | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1851 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.0% |
| 1852 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.4% |
| 1853 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1854 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.8% |
| 1855 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1856 | 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1857 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.6% |
| 1858 | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.3% |
| 1859 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1860 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1861 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1862 | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1863 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1864 | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.6% |
| 1865 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.0% |
| 1866 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1867 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1868 | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -23.8% |
| 1869 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +37.0% |
| 1870 | 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.7% |
| 1871 | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1872 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1873 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1874 | 37.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1875 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1876 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1877 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.1% |
| 1878 | 35.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1879 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.8% |
| 1880 | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1881 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1882 | 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1883 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1884 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1885 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1886 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1887 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1888 | 34.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1889 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1890 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1891 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1892 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.9% |
| 1893 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1894 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1895 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.8% |
| 1896 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1897 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1898 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.5% |
| 1899 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1900 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1901 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1902 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1903 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1904 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.8% |
| 1905 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1906 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1907 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1909 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1910 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1911 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1912 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.5% |
| 1914 | 28.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1915 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1916 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1917 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1918 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1919 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -19.3% |
| 1920 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +31.7% |
| 1921 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1922 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1923 | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1924 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1925 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1926 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1927 | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1928 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1929 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1930 | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1931 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1932 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1933 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.1% |
| 1934 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1935 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1936 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1937 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1938 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.5% |
| 1939 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1940 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -16.0% |
| 1941 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +36.0% |
| 1942 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -31.4% |
| 1943 | 20.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +22.9% |
| 1944 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1945 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +19.7% |
| 1946 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.4% |
| 1947 | 28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1948 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1949 | 26.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1950 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1951 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1952 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1953 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1954 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1955 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1956 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1957 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1958 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1959 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1960 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1961 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1962 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1963 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1964 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1965 | 17.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1966 | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1967 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1968 | 15.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1969 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.2% |
| 1970 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1971 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1972 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1973 | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1974 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.0% |
| 1975 | 13.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1976 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1977 | 13.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1978 | 13.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1979 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1980 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1981 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 13.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1983 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1984 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1985 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1986 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1987 | 12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1988 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.7% |
| 1989 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 13.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1991 | 13.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1993 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1995 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1996 | 11.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1997 | 11.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1998 | 11.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1999 | 11.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 2001 | 10.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 2002 | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 2003 | 10.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 2004 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 2005 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 11.17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 2007 | 11.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 2008 | 11.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 11.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 2010 | 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
Finland compared with similar countries
- Finland's 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 98% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Finland's 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.0× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1810 | +41.6% | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1869 | +37.0% | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1941 | +36.0% | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1920 | +31.7% | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1942 | -31.4% | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1750s | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 46.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1760s | 43.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 46.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1770s | 40.01 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1780s | 39.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1790s | 40.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1800s | 36.04 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1810s | 37.79 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1820s | 38.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1830s | 33.56 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1840s | 35.35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1850s | 35.87 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1860s | 34.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1870s | 36.96 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1880s | 35.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 32.58 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 32.51 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 27.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 24.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 20.06 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 23.54 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 21.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 17.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 13.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.99 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 2000s | 11.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 38 Puerto Rico 11.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 39 Denmark 11.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 40 Albania 11.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 42 Canada 11.34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 43 Netherlands 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 44 Poland 10.82 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Finland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2998 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1241 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1748 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6733 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9518 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Finland?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Finland was 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 46.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1755.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2002.
- How does Finland rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Finland ranks 41st out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 259 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.