The demographic transition in Sweden in Barbados
Barbados: The demographic transition in Sweden was 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2007. ▼ Falling
Latest (2007)
12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 3.3%
World rank
28th
of 56 countries
All-time high
37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1920
All-time low
12.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2006
Years of data
92
1910–2007
The demographic transition in Sweden in Barbados, 1910–2007
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
In 2007, the demographic transition in sweden in Barbados stood at 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population).
That represents a change of up 3.3% on the previous year and down 3.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Barbados peaked at 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1920 and was at its lowest, 12.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2006.
That places Barbados 28th out of 56 countries with data for 2007, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 92 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Barbados, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1910 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1911 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1912 | 36.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1913 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.3% |
| 1914 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.2% |
| 1915 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -21.1% |
| 1916 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.2% |
| 1917 | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.6% |
| 1918 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.9% |
| 1919 | 34.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.6% |
| 1920 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.4% |
| 1921 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.1% |
| 1922 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1923 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.0% |
| 1924 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.0% |
| 1925 | 34.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.1% |
| 1926 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.3% |
| 1927 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1928 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.0% |
| 1929 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1930 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1931 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1932 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.2% |
| 1933 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1934 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1935 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1936 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.1% |
| 1937 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1938 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1939 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1940 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1941 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1942 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1943 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1944 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1945 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1946 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1947 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1948 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1949 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1950 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1951 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1952 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.0% |
| 1953 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1954 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1955 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1956 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.3% |
| 1957 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1958 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1959 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1960 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.1% |
| 1961 | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.7% |
| 1962 | 29.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1963 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1964 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1965 | 26.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1966 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1967 | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.5% |
| 1968 | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1969 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1970 | 20.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1971 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 1972 | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1973 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1974 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1975 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1976 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1977 | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1978 | 17.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1979 | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1980 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1981 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.0% |
| 1982 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1983 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1984 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1985 | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1986 | 15.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1987 | 15.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1988 | 14.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1989 | 15.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.1% |
| 1990 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.0% |
| 1991 | 16.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1992 | 15.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1993 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.1% |
| 1995 | 13.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.4% |
| 1996 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 2000 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.3% |
| 2003 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 2004 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.0% |
| 2005 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 12.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 2007 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
Barbados compared with similar countries
- Barbados's 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.1× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Barbados's 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 71% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 33.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 33.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 32.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 32.18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 32.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 26.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 19.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.97 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 6 |
| 2000s | 13.11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 6 |
Countries ranked near Barbados
- 25 Trinidad and Tobago 13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 26 Australia 13.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 27 Martinique 13.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 29 France 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 30 Norway 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 31 Russia 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Barbados
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0217 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0558 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0558 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0377 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.118 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2758 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Barbados?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Barbados was 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2007, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Barbados?
- The highest recorded value was 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1920.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Barbados?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2006.
- How does Barbados rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Barbados ranks 28th out of 56 countries with data for 2007.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Barbados?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Barbados data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 92 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.