The demographic transition in Sweden in Russia
Russia: The demographic transition in Sweden was 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
31st
of 56 countries
All-time high
52.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1864
All-time low
8.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1999
Years of data
128
1861–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Russia, 1861–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in Russia is 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2010.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.8% on the previous year and up 45.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Russia peaked at 52.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1864 and was at its lowest, 8.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1999.
That places Russia 31st out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 128 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Russia, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1861 | 49.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1862 | 51.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1863 | 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1864 | 52.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.8% |
| 1865 | 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1867 | 51.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1868 | 48.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1869 | 49.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1870 | 49.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1871 | 51 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1872 | 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1873 | 52.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.6% |
| 1874 | 51.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1875 | 51.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.2% |
| 1876 | 50.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1877 | 49.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1878 | 47.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1879 | 50.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.1% |
| 1880 | 49.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1881 | 49.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1882 | 51.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.1% |
| 1883 | 50.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1884 | 51.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1885 | 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1886 | 49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1887 | 49.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1888 | 49.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1889 | 51.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1890 | 50.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1891 | 50.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1892 | 46 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.1% |
| 1893 | 48.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.1% |
| 1894 | 49.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1895 | 50.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1896 | 50.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1897 | 50 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1898 | 48.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1899 | 49.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1900 | 49.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 47.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1902 | 49.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1903 | 48.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1904 | 48.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1905 | 45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.4% |
| 1906 | 47.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1907 | 47.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1908 | 44.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1909 | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1910 | 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1911 | 45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1912 | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1913 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1920 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -28.3% |
| 1921 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.5% |
| 1922 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1923 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.2% |
| 1924 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.1% |
| 1925 | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1926 | 43.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1927 | 43.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1928 | 44.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1935 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -32.1% |
| 1936 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.6% |
| 1937 | 38.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.2% |
| 1938 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1939 | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1940 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.5% |
| 1946 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -23.7% |
| 1950 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.2% |
| 1951 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1952 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1953 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1954 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.0% |
| 1955 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1956 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1958 | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1959 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1960 | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1961 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1962 | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1963 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1964 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1965 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1966 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1967 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1968 | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1969 | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1970 | 17.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1971 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1972 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1974 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1975 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1976 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1977 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1978 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1979 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1981 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1982 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1983 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.8% |
| 1984 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1985 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1986 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1987 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1988 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1990 | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -28.7% |
| 1991 | 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.7% |
| 1992 | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.6% |
| 1993 | 9.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.1% |
| 1994 | 9.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1995 | 9.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1996 | 8.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1997 | 8.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1998 | 8.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1999 | 8.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 2000 | 8.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 2001 | 9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 2002 | 9.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.7% |
| 2003 | 10.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.2% |
| 2004 | 10.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 2005 | 10.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 2006 | 10.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 2007 | 11.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.1% |
| 2008 | 12.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.6% |
| 2009 | 12.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 2010 | 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
Russia compared with similar countries
- Russia's 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.1× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Russia's 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.1× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Russia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1935 | -32.1% | 44.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1990 | -28.7% | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1920 | -28.3% | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 50.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 48.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 52.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8 |
| 1870s | 50.31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 47.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 52.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1880s | 50.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 51.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 49.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 46 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 50.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 47.21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 49.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 44.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4 |
| 1920s | 39.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1930s | 35.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 5 |
| 1940s | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 2 |
| 1950s | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 17.96 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 19.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1990s | 9.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Russia
- 28 Barbados 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 29 France 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 30 Norway 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 32 Cyprus 12.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 33 Sweden 12.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 34 China 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Russia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 26.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 26.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 31.32 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 19.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 129.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 26.88 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Russia?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Russia was 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Russia?
- The highest recorded value was 52.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1864.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Russia?
- The lowest recorded value was 8.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1999.
- How does Russia rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Russia ranks 31st out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Russia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 45.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Russia data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 128 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.