The demographic transition in Sweden in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: The demographic transition in Sweden was 13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2006. ▼ Falling
Latest (2006)
13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 4.0%
World rank
25th
of 56 countries
All-time high
41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1954
All-time low
13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2002
Years of data
122
1883–2006
The demographic transition in Sweden in Trinidad and Tobago, 1883–2006
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Trinidad and Tobago recorded 13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2006.
The figure is up 4.0% on the previous year and down 1.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1954 and was at its lowest, 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2002.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 25th of 56 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 122 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1883 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1884 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1885 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1886 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1887 | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1888 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.2% |
| 1889 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1890 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.3% |
| 1891 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1892 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1893 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1894 | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1895 | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1896 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1897 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1898 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1899 | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.7% |
| 1900 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1901 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1902 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1903 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1904 | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.2% |
| 1905 | 36.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1906 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1907 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1908 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1909 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1910 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1911 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.2% |
| 1912 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1913 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1914 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1915 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1916 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1917 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1918 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.7% |
| 1919 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1920 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1922 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.9% |
| 1923 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.1% |
| 1924 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1925 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1926 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1927 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1928 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1929 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.1% |
| 1930 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1931 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1932 | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1933 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.2% |
| 1934 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1935 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.7% |
| 1936 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1937 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1938 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1939 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.8% |
| 1940 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.6% |
| 1941 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1942 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1943 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.0% |
| 1944 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1945 | 39.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1946 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1947 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1948 | 39.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1949 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1950 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1951 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1952 | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1953 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.0% |
| 1954 | 41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.1% |
| 1955 | 41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.7% |
| 1957 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1958 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1959 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1960 | 39.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1961 | 37.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1962 | 37.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1964 | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1965 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1966 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.9% |
| 1967 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1968 | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1969 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.3% |
| 1970 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.4% |
| 1971 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1972 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.4% |
| 1973 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1974 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1975 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1976 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1977 | 26.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1979 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1980 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1981 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1982 | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1983 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1984 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1985 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.9% |
| 1986 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1987 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.4% |
| 1988 | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1989 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.0% |
| 1990 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.7% |
| 1991 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1992 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1993 | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.1% |
| 1994 | 15.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.1% |
| 1995 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1996 | 14.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.2% |
| 1997 | 14.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1999 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 2000 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 2001 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 2002 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 2003 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.3% |
| 2004 | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 2006 | 13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
Trinidad and Tobago compared with similar countries
- Trinidad and Tobago's 13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.2× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Trinidad and Tobago's 13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 76% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 |
| 1890s | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 34.91 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 32.56 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 31.31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 37.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 32.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 26.74 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 16.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 2000s | 13.84 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 6 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 22 Chile 14.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 23 New Zealand 14.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 24 Uruguay 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 26 Australia 13.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 27 Martinique 13.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 28 Barbados 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0589 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0005 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2333 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0945 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3189 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7976 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0027 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Trinidad and Tobago was 13.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2006, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 41.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1954.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2002.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 25th out of 56 countries with data for 2006.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 122 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.