The demographic transition in Sweden in Norway
Norway: The demographic transition in Sweden was 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 1.8%
World rank
30th
of 56 countries
All-time high
36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1756
All-time low
12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1983
Years of data
260
1749–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Norway, 1749–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Norway recorded 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2010.
The figure is down 1.8% on the previous year and down 4.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Norway peaked at 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1756 and was at its lowest, 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1983.
Norway ranks 30th of 56 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 260 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Norway, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1749 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1750 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1751 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +14.4% |
| 1752 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1753 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.9% |
| 1754 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1755 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1756 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.8% |
| 1757 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1758 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1759 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1760 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.4% |
| 1761 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1762 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1763 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1764 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1765 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1766 | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1767 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1768 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1769 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1770 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1771 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1772 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.8% |
| 1773 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.3% |
| 1774 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.2% |
| 1775 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +19.4% |
| 1776 | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.8% |
| 1777 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.7% |
| 1778 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1779 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1780 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1781 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1782 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1783 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.7% |
| 1784 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.5% |
| 1785 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1786 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.9% |
| 1787 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1788 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.1% |
| 1789 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1790 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.6% |
| 1791 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1792 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.1% |
| 1793 | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1794 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1795 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1796 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1797 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1798 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1799 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1801 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -30.2% |
| 1802 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +21.6% |
| 1803 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1804 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1805 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 1806 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1807 | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1808 | 26.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.2% |
| 1809 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -17.5% |
| 1810 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +18.5% |
| 1811 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1812 | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.0% |
| 1813 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.0% |
| 1814 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1815 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +23.6% |
| 1816 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.4% |
| 1817 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.4% |
| 1818 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1819 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1820 | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1821 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1822 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1823 | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1824 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1825 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.5% |
| 1826 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1827 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.0% |
| 1828 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1829 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.7% |
| 1830 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1831 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1832 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1833 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1834 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1835 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1836 | 29.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.8% |
| 1837 | 28.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1838 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1839 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1840 | 27.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.1% |
| 1841 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.2% |
| 1842 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1843 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1844 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1845 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1846 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1847 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1848 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1849 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.4% |
| 1850 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1852 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1854 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.2% |
| 1855 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1856 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1857 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1858 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1859 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.9% |
| 1860 | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1861 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.8% |
| 1862 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.6% |
| 1863 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1864 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1865 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1867 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1868 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1869 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1870 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1871 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1872 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1873 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1874 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1875 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1876 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1877 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1878 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1879 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1880 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1881 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1882 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1883 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1884 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1885 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1886 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1887 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1888 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1889 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1890 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1891 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1892 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1893 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1894 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1895 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1896 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1897 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1899 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1900 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1901 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1902 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1903 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1904 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1905 | 27.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1906 | 26.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1907 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1908 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 26.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1910 | 25.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1911 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1912 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1913 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1914 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 23.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.0% |
| 1916 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1917 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1918 | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1919 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.7% |
| 1920 | 26.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.0% |
| 1921 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1922 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1923 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1924 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1925 | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1926 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1927 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.7% |
| 1928 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1929 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1930 | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1931 | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1932 | 16 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1933 | 14.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.1% |
| 1934 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1935 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1936 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1937 | 15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1938 | 15.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1939 | 15.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1940 | 16.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1941 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1942 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.7% |
| 1943 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.8% |
| 1944 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.4% |
| 1945 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1946 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.0% |
| 1947 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1948 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1949 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1950 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1951 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1952 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1953 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1955 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1958 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1959 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1960 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1961 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 17.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1963 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1964 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1965 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1968 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1971 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1972 | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1973 | 15.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1974 | 15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1975 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.0% |
| 1976 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1977 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1978 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1979 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1981 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1982 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1983 | 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1984 | 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1986 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1987 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1988 | 13.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.2% |
| 1989 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1990 | 14.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1991 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1992 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1993 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1994 | 13.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1995 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1996 | 13.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1997 | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1998 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1999 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 2000 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2001 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 2002 | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 2003 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 2004 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2006 | 12.56 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 2007 | 12.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 2008 | 12.69 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 2009 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 2010 | 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
Norway compared with similar countries
- Norway's 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.1× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Norway's 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.1× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Norway changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1801 | -30.2% | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1740s | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
| 1750s | 33.92 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1760s | 34.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1770s | 30.18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1780s | 30.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1790s | 32.85 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1800s | 27.09 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1810s | 29.21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1820s | 33.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1830s | 30.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1840s | 30.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1850s | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1860s | 31.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1870s | 30.78 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1880s | 30.79 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 30.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 27.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 24.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 21.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 15.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 19.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 18.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 17.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 14.56 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 12.56 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Norway
- 27 Martinique 13.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 28 Barbados 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 29 France 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 31 Russia 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 32 Cyprus 12.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 33 Sweden 12.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Norway
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3703 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3621 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0618 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.7734 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3366 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Norway?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Norway was 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1756.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1983.
- How does Norway rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Norway ranks 30th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 260 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.