The demographic transition in Sweden in France
France: The demographic transition in Sweden was 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
29th
of 56 countries
All-time high
33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1814
All-time low
9.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1916
Years of data
210
1801–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in France, 1801–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in France is 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2010.
That represents a change of down 0.1% on the previous year and down 4.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in France peaked at 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1814 and was at its lowest, 9.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1916.
That places France 29th out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 210 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in France, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1801 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1802 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1803 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1804 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1805 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1806 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1807 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1808 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1809 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1810 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1811 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1812 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1813 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1814 | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.1% |
| 1815 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1816 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1817 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1818 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1819 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.5% |
| 1820 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1821 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1824 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1825 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1826 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1827 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1828 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1829 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1830 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1831 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1832 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1833 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1834 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1835 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1836 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1837 | 28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1838 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1839 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1840 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1841 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1842 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1844 | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1845 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1846 | 27.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1847 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1848 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1849 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1850 | 26.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1851 | 27.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1852 | 26.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1853 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1854 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1855 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1856 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1857 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1858 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1859 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1860 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1861 | 26.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1862 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1863 | 26.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1864 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1865 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1866 | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1867 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1868 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1869 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1870 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1871 | 22.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.6% |
| 1872 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.6% |
| 1873 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1874 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1875 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1876 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1877 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1878 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1879 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1880 | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1881 | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1882 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1883 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1885 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1886 | 23.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1887 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1888 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1889 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1890 | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1891 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1892 | 22.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1893 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1894 | 22.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1895 | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1896 | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1897 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1898 | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1899 | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1900 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1901 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1902 | 21.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1903 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1904 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1905 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1906 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1907 | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1908 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1909 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1910 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1911 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1912 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1913 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1914 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1915 | 11.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -34.6% |
| 1916 | 9.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -19.4% |
| 1917 | 10.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.4% |
| 1918 | 12.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.3% |
| 1919 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.2% |
| 1920 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +64.6% |
| 1921 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1922 | 19.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1923 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1924 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1925 | 19 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1926 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1927 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1928 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1929 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1930 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1931 | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1932 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1933 | 16.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1934 | 16.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1936 | 15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1937 | 14.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1938 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1939 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 13.63 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1941 | 13.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1942 | 14.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.7% |
| 1943 | 15.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.3% |
| 1944 | 16.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1945 | 16.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1946 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +28.8% |
| 1947 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1948 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1949 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1950 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1951 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1952 | 19.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1953 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1954 | 18.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1956 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1957 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1959 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1960 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1961 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1962 | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1963 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1964 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1966 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1967 | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1968 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1969 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 17.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1972 | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1973 | 16.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1974 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.7% |
| 1975 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.8% |
| 1976 | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1977 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1978 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1979 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1980 | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.7% |
| 1981 | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1983 | 13.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1984 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1985 | 13.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1986 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1987 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1988 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1990 | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1991 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1992 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1993 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1994 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1995 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1996 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1997 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1998 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1999 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 2000 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.9% |
| 2001 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 2002 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 2003 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2004 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2005 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 12.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 2007 | 12.68 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 2008 | 12.78 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 2009 | 12.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2010 | 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.1% |
France compared with similar countries
- France's 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.1× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- France's 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.1× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in France changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920 | +64.6% | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1915 | -34.6% | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1946 | +28.8% | 16.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 31.98 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1810s | 31.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1820s | 31.16 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1830s | 29.19 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1840s | 27.54 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1850s | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1860s | 26.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1870s | 25.56 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1880s | 24.16 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 22.17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 20.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 15.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 19.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 15.94 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 17.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 18.84 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 14.11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.74 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 12.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near France
- 26 Australia 13.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 27 Martinique 13.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 28 Barbados 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 30 Norway 12.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 31 Russia 12.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 32 Cyprus 12.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for France
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 22.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 22.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 18.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 11.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 14.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 106.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 15.3 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in France?
- The demographic transition in sweden in France was 12.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in France?
- The highest recorded value was 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1814.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in France?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1916.
- How does France rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- France ranks 29th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in France?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this France data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 210 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.