Clientelism Index in Haiti
Haiti: Clientelism Index was 0.877 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Clientelism Index in Haiti, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Haiti recorded 0.877 for clientelism index in 2025.
The figure is up 2.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Haiti peaked at 0.924 in 1792 and was at its lowest, 0.706, in 1931.
That places Haiti 9th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Clientelism Index in Haiti, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.736 | — |
| 1790 | 0.736 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.736 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.924 | +25.5% |
| 1793 | 0.924 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.924 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.924 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.924 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.924 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.823 | -10.9% |
| 1799 | 0.823 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.823 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.823 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.905 | +10.0% |
| 1803 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.882 | -2.5% |
| 1906 | 0.875 | -0.8% |
| 1907 | 0.875 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.876 | +0.1% |
| 1909 | 0.88 | +0.5% |
| 1910 | 0.88 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.88 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.88 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.88 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.88 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.759 | -13.7% |
| 1916 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.759 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.747 | -1.6% |
| 1931 | 0.706 | -5.5% |
| 1932 | 0.769 | +8.9% |
| 1933 | 0.77 | +0.1% |
| 1934 | 0.77 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.77 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.777 | +0.9% |
| 1937 | 0.79 | +1.7% |
| 1938 | 0.79 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.79 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.79 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.778 | -1.5% |
| 1942 | 0.778 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.778 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.778 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.778 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.8 | +2.8% |
| 1947 | 0.813 | +1.6% |
| 1948 | 0.813 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.813 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.812 | -0.1% |
| 1951 | 0.811 | -0.1% |
| 1952 | 0.811 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.811 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.811 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.787 | -3.0% |
| 1956 | 0.787 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.868 | +10.3% |
| 1958 | 0.879 | +1.3% |
| 1959 | 0.879 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.879 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.849 | -3.4% |
| 1962 | 0.835 | -1.6% |
| 1963 | 0.835 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.833 | -0.2% |
| 1965 | 0.832 | -0.1% |
| 1966 | 0.832 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.817 | -1.8% |
| 1968 | 0.816 | -0.1% |
| 1969 | 0.816 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.816 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.816 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.816 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.801 | -1.8% |
| 1974 | 0.799 | -0.2% |
| 1975 | 0.799 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.799 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.799 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.799 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.821 | +2.8% |
| 1980 | 0.824 | +0.4% |
| 1981 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.804 | -2.4% |
| 1985 | 0.802 | -0.2% |
| 1986 | 0.809 | +0.9% |
| 1987 | 0.803 | -0.7% |
| 1988 | 0.777 | -3.2% |
| 1989 | 0.777 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.797 | +2.6% |
| 1991 | 0.795 | -0.3% |
| 1992 | 0.802 | +0.9% |
| 1993 | 0.759 | -5.4% |
| 1994 | 0.766 | +0.9% |
| 1995 | 0.791 | +3.3% |
| 1996 | 0.79 | -0.1% |
| 1997 | 0.791 | +0.1% |
| 1998 | 0.791 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.791 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.811 | +2.5% |
| 2001 | 0.824 | +1.6% |
| 2002 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.824 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.834 | +1.2% |
| 2005 | 0.836 | +0.2% |
| 2006 | 0.808 | -3.3% |
| 2007 | 0.805 | -0.4% |
| 2008 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.801 | -0.5% |
| 2011 | 0.853 | +6.5% |
| 2012 | 0.844 | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 0.844 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.844 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.854 | +1.2% |
| 2016 | 0.883 | +3.4% |
| 2017 | 0.866 | -1.9% |
| 2018 | 0.858 | -0.9% |
| 2019 | 0.858 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.848 | -1.2% |
| 2021 | 0.856 | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.827 | -3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.827 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.877 | +6.0% |
| 2025 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
Haiti compared with similar countries
- Haiti's 0.877 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.6325, 1.4× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Haiti's 0.877 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.514, 1.7× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.736 | 0.736 | 0.736 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.8662 | 0.736 | 0.924 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.8886 | 0.823 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.8913 | 0.875 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.8195 | 0.759 | 0.88 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.759 | 0.759 | 0.759 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.7679 | 0.706 | 0.79 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.7919 | 0.778 | 0.813 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.8256 | 0.787 | 0.879 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.8344 | 0.816 | 0.879 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.8065 | 0.799 | 0.821 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.8068 | 0.777 | 0.824 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7873 | 0.759 | 0.802 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8176 | 0.805 | 0.836 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8505 | 0.801 | 0.883 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.852 | 0.827 | 0.877 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Haiti
More reference data data for Haiti
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2934 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0485 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9837 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6522 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2643 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Haiti?
- Clientelism index in Haiti was 0.877 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Haiti?
- The highest recorded value was 0.924 in 1792.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Haiti?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.706 in 1931.
- How does Haiti rank for clientelism index?
- Haiti ranks 9th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Haiti?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Haiti data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.