Haiti vs Myanmar: Clientelism Index
Haiti
0.877
in 2025
Myanmar
0.878
in 2025
Haiti rank
9th
Myanmar rank
8th
Clientelism Index over time
- Haiti
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.878 against 0.877 in Haiti, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 9th and Myanmar ranks 8th of 176 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.8913 | 0.317 | 0.5743 | Haiti |
| 1910s | 0.8195 | 0.317 | 0.5025 | Haiti |
| 1920s | 0.759 | 0.3013 | 0.4577 | Haiti |
| 1930s | 0.7679 | 0.2968 | 0.4711 | Haiti |
| 1940s | 0.7919 | 0.3769 | 0.415 | Haiti |
| 1950s | 0.8256 | 0.4427 | 0.3829 | Haiti |
| 1960s | 0.8344 | 0.6075 | 0.2269 | Haiti |
| 1970s | 0.8065 | 0.7235 | 0.083 | Haiti |
| 1980s | 0.8068 | 0.7521 | 0.0547 | Haiti |
| 1990s | 0.7873 | 0.7013 | 0.086 | Haiti |
| 2000s | 0.8176 | 0.702 | 0.1156 | Haiti |
| 2010s | 0.8505 | 0.5121 | 0.3384 | Haiti |
| 2020s | 0.852 | 0.6515 | 0.2005 | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Haiti or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 0.878 against 0.877 in Haiti as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Haiti and Myanmar?
- 0.001, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Myanmar?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Haiti and Myanmar rank globally for clientelism index?
- Haiti ranks 9th and Myanmar ranks 8th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.