Voice and Accountability in Eswatini
Eswatini: Voice and Accountability was 0.1338 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Eswatini, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
Eswatini recorded 0.1338 standard error for voice and accountability in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.4% on the previous year and down 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Eswatini peaked at 0.2994 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1338 standard error, in 2011.
That places Eswatini 15th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2994 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2967 standard error | -0.9% |
| 2000 | 0.2675 standard error | -9.8% |
| 2002 | 0.2285 standard error | -14.6% |
| 2003 | 0.2196 standard error | -3.9% |
| 2004 | 0.1989 standard error | -9.4% |
| 2005 | 0.2018 standard error | +1.4% |
| 2006 | 0.1426 standard error | -29.3% |
| 2007 | 0.1442 standard error | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 0.1363 standard error | -5.5% |
| 2009 | 0.1354 standard error | -0.7% |
| 2010 | 0.1344 standard error | -0.8% |
| 2011 | 0.1338 standard error | -0.4% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 0.1338 standard error is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1161 standard error, 1.2× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 0.1338 standard error is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1248 standard error, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.298 standard error | 0.2967 standard error | 0.2994 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1861 standard error | 0.1354 standard error | 0.2675 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1341 standard error | 0.1338 standard error | 0.1344 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More reference data data for Eswatini
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0048 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.026 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Eswatini?
- Voice and accountability in Eswatini was 0.1338 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2994 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1338 standard error in 2011.
- How does Eswatini rank for voice and accountability?
- Eswatini ranks 15th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.